Cows are a signal of wealth and pride in Rwanda. Bridal dowries are paid in the form of cows. Mpa inka! literally translated means “Give me a cow!” and is a common expression used to show surprise or disbelief. Visit any Rwandan at her home and she will likely offer you a large mug of warm milk (often accompanied with an excessive amount of sugar). Traditional Rwandan dance involves raising your arms and hands and swaying them, like the large horns of precious Rwandan cows.
"Cow callers" sing to the cows presented at a bride's dowry ceremony |
The Rwandan government has initiated a “one cow per family”
program, which aims to provide poor families in Rwanda with cows. Villagers
meet together to vote on which family is most in need of support, and later
provides them with a cow. Once this cow has given birth, the recipient family
will return the calf to the village so it can be given to another poor family.
All the while, the cow’s milk and manure can provide nutrition, fertilizer, and/or income for the
family, as well as generally elevating their social status.
When I first heard about this program I thought it was
ridiculous. Just give a cow away?! If
you have read any other posts on this blog, you know how I feel about this sort
of charity. Early in my service, when I visited the home of two malnourished siblings and found their
father drinking sorghum beer, feeding an enormous government-donated cow while
his children cried with hunger, I felt my skepticism was vindicated. Months
later I found the man had sold the cow and spent all the money on alcohol.
There are numerous problems with this model. Send a Cow in particular, has received criticism several times for the amount of money they actually spend on donated farm animals versus their European office and administrative costs. More
importantly, however, cows don’t just magically produce nutritious, income
generating milk. They also consume an enormous amount of food. In the most
densely populated country in Africa, you can imagine how taxing it is for
farmers and families to decide between using their scarce land to plant food
for themselves or their cows. In case you’re wondering, it’s often the cow
that is prioritized.
Environmentalists worldwide have come out against this animal giving charity scheme. Conservationists at the World Land Trust have
referred to these projects as “environmentally unsound and economically
disastrous”. Scientists are also warning, world food shortages and the impact of animal grazing on water supply and farming is alarming.
So, why the ruinous program to provide everyone with a cow?
The cooperative nature of the scheme forces Rwandans of
all ethnic backgrounds to work together for the sake of community development. If you look further back in Rwandan history, you can understand even more.
Traditionally, the minority Tutsi ethnic group (persecuted
and indiscriminately slaughtered in the 1994 genocide and in several previous
attacks dating as far back as the 1962 independence), were cow herders. Many
were Rwandan royalty and considered much superior to their neighbors, the
majority Hutu ethnic group, who were poor land farmers. While attending a
Genocide remembrance ceremony last year, a survivor retold the audience how
groups of interahamwe came through
the villages, stealing all the cows of the Tutsi they were about to kill. I was
surprised by the emphasis he placed on the loss of cows while retelling a story about the death of almost a million people.
So, in my very non-expert opinion, I think I understand how, when the Tutsi-born President tells his countrymen (the majority
of which remain poor, rural farmers, and are descendants of Hutus), that they
should all have the opportunity to
own cows, the positive symbolism and good will, in this case, might outweigh the negative
environmental and agricultural effects.
No comments:
Post a Comment